Metals
  • Gold$3,993.62/oz0.00%
  • Silver$53.90/oz+0.02%
  • Platinum$1,552.00/oz0.00%
  • Palladium$1,046.50/oz0.00%
  • Copper$6.48/lb0.00%
  • Aluminium$3,047/t+0.01%
  • Nickel$15,870/t+0.13%
  • Zinc$3,744/t−0.09%
  • Lead$1,895/t−0.49%
  • Lithium$14,542/t−0.04%
  • Cobalt$23.11/lb0.00%
  • Uranium$90.10/lb+0.02%
Indicative · 08:22 UTC · Prices by MetalCharts
Mining Finance

Copper and Lithium Outlook 2024: Mining Investments Focus

Global edition
Copper and Lithium Outlook 2024: Mining Investments Focus

Step 1) Internal plan (before writing)

1) Article type:
Daily newsletter / market digest with an explicit mining investments lens (valuations, M&A/transactions, royalties/streams, commodity price outlook).

2) Images appropriate:
Primarily real, documentary-style mining photography (open pits, processing plants, control rooms; minimal people). Use existing marketing assets first; generate only if we’re missing a relevant editorial image.

3) Research needed:

  • Pull internal Skillings links to anchor coverage (valuation/P-NAV, copper, lithium, newsletter pillars).
  • Pull external context for M&A and deal structures (e.g., S&P Global MI mining M&A summary; streaming/royalty explainer).
  • Confirm Lithium Power Map presale page and checkout links.

Step 2) Company context gathered (internal links + imagery)

Key internal pages to link:

Marketing asset library (usable editorial images found):
Open-pit haul trucks, underground drill jumbo, control room, lithium ponds, and Lithium Power Map product-in-hand image.


Step 3) Topic research (external context pulled)

Relevant external sources used for context and attribution:


Today’s investment setup (why this matters)

Mining investors are still operating in a market defined by selective capital, higher discount rates, and a widening spread between (1) assets that can finance and build on time and (2) assets that can’t. That spread shows up in P/NAV dispersion, deal terms, and the growing role of royalties/streams as gap-fillers in development funding.

Skillings’ own mid-year framing has been consistent: 2026 is less about “supercycle hype” and more about capital discipline, policy risk, and power constraints shaping who gets funded and who gets acquired. See:


Market snapshot (investor dashboard)

Note: Prices below are presented as “directional” (not live) to support relative positioning and risk framing in today’s digest. For real-time execution, use your terminal/pricing vendor.

Asset / Indicator Directional tone What investors watch this week Valuation sensitivity
Copper Firm capex slippage, permitting, power access High (long-duration NAVs)
Gold Supported real rates, central bank buying, geopolitics Medium (cash-flow levered)
Silver Tightening narrative industrial demand + deficit debate High for silver-heavy NAVs
Lithium Selective cost curve + “financeable supply” vs stranded Very high (sentiment + NAV)
Uranium Policy + contracting driven SMR timelines, utility contracting cadence Medium-high

Lead story: Valuations : the P/NAV gap is still the headline

Skillings continues to highlight a core 2026 investment tension: project NAV math is not clearing in public markets the way it typically does in earlier-cycle risk-on conditions.

A clear example cited in Skillings coverage is McEwen Copper’s Los Azules in Argentina: after-tax NPV(8%) ~US$2.9B (per the project’s 2025 feasibility study), versus an implied private valuation around US$1.0B, equating to ~0.34x P/NAV: despite EIA approval and entry into Argentina’s Large Investment Incentive Regime (RIGI).
Source context: https://skillings.net/skillings-mining-intelligence-valuations-royalty-pivots-and-the-silicon-nuclear-nexus

Investor takeaway: the market is paying less for “model value” and more for time-to-finance, time-to-power, and time-to-build. In practice, that pushes capital toward:

  • assets with a credible financing path (strategic partner, royalty/stream, offtake-backed credit), and
  • teams that can keep capex and schedule volatility contained.

Mining operations control room monitoring fleets and production in real time


Major story #2: M&A intelligence : 2025 deal data sets the 2026 baseline

If you’re anchoring expectations for 2026 activity, the most useful starting point is last year’s mix of gold and copper-led transactions and the sharp cooling in lithium deal value.

S&P Global Market Intelligence pegged 2025 mining M&A at about US$52.71 billion across 50 deals, noting gold deal value at a 15-year high and lithium deal value down 89% year-over-year.
Source: https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2026/03/mining-m-and-a-in-2025-copper-gold-remain-center-stage

How that maps into today’s investment lens:

  • Gold: high prices support cash-flow and reserve replacement; buyers can justify paying for quality ounces: if execution risk is controllable.
  • Copper: scarcity value persists, but buyers are allergic to schedule risk (power, permitting, long-lead equipment).
  • Lithium: the market is still separating “low-cost, financeable supply” from projects that remain price-cycle hostages.

What to watch in deal terms (not just headlines):

  • contingent payments tied to construction milestones and ramp-up
  • staged acquisitions (to reduce upfront risk)
  • royalties/streams attached to funding packages (hybrid capital stacks)

Large-scale open-pit mine with benches and winding haul roads


Major story #3: Royalty/streaming : financing is becoming the story, not the footnote

In 2026, the key investment insight is that royalties/streams are no longer “alternative” finance: they’re often a core layer in the stack for capital-intensive builds.

A useful explainer of how streams work (and why they’ve grown) is here:
https://www.allens.com.au/insights-news/insights/2026/04/mining-streams-a-simple-guide-to-an-emerging-finance-powerhouse/

Why investors should care:

  • For miners, a stream can reduce equity dilution or bridge a debt shortfall: but may cap upside on a portion of future production.
  • For streamers/royalty holders, the instrument can offer commodity upside with reduced operating exposure, but still carries counterparty and completion risk.

Deal-analytics checklist (quick):

  1. Attributable volume / percentage of payable metal
  2. Ongoing purchase price (fixed vs indexed; inflation clauses)
  3. Security package (asset-level security, covenants)
  4. Completion tests and remedies (step-in rights, cash sweeps)
  5. Expansion optionality (does the royalty/stream clip future brownfield growth?)

Skillings’ own “royalty pivot” theme also extends beyond corporate finance: into fiscal design. Where governments shift from equity participation to royalty-style participation, that can change project risk in ways the market will re-price (stability vs take-rate uncertainty).
Context: https://skillings.net/skillings-mining-intelligence-valuations-royalty-pivots-and-the-silicon-nuclear-nexus

Underground drill jumbo working at the face in a modern mine tunnel


Major story #4: Commodity outlook : base/bull/bear framing for valuation work

Below is a practical, investment-facing outlook table you can use as a valuation sensitivity overlay (for P/NAV and deal pricing), rather than a standalone “price call.”

Commodity Base case (what has to be true) Bull case catalyst Bear case risk Where it shows up in P/NAV
Copper demand growth holds; supply additions remain slow grid + data center buildout accelerates China demand softness; faster scrap response long-duration projects most sensitive
Gold macro uncertainty persists; costs manageable real yields fall; geopolitical premium rises stable rates + stronger USD producers re-rate via margin durability
Silver industrial demand stays resilient persistent deficits tighten substitution/recycling surprises high leverage for silver-heavy miners
Lithium cost curve clears; financing favors top assets downstream supply chain tightens unexpectedly prolonged oversupply in marginal producers developers swing hardest (discount rates)

For deeper Skillings frameworks that connect commodity narratives to capital discipline and risk, see:
https://skillings.net/skillings-mining-intelligence-navigating-the-2026-supercycle-transition/


What we’re watching (investment calendar : the next 7 days)

  • P/NAV re-rating signals: financing announcements, revised capex guidance, or permitting wins that compress discount rates.
  • Deal structure drift: more hybrids (royalty/stream + offtake + senior debt) as banks remain selective.
  • Policy catalysts: fiscal shifts (royalty frameworks, local content requirements) that re-price jurisdiction risk quickly.
  • Lithium bifurcation: which projects can show credible pathways to conversion/refining and stable reagent/acid economics (a recurring Skillings focus). Start with: https://skillings.net/2026-lithium-power-map

Recommended reading (Skillings links)


Presale footer: The 2026 Lithium Power Map

Gloved hand holding the 2026 Lithium Power Map at an active mine site

Lithium markets are shifting beyond a simple EV-only narrative: toward AI infrastructure, grid reinforcement, and geopolitics. The 2026 Lithium Power Map is built to help investors and operators track where control, capital, and conversion capacity are concentrating.


About the author

Charles Pitts

Charles Pitts

Publisher & Lead Macro-Strategist

Charles Pitts is the publisher of Skillings Mining Review, the trade journal that has covered mining since 1912. He writes on the macro forces behind metal prices: commodity cycles, sovereign capital and the shifting sources of demand.

His current work argues that hyperscale AI, and the gigawatt-scale power its data centres need, is becoming a buyer of lithium and copper in its own right, competing with the automotive supply chain for tier-one reserves.

Tags:

More from Skillings